The actual license text doesn't match what's declared at all -- it verbatim-matches (or closely resembles) a different SPDX license entirely. LICENSE= is very likely wrong.
undeclared
manual review
LICENSE= isn't set on this port at all. Needs a license identifier added before anything else here is possible.
no match
manual review
The license text doesn't resemble any license in the SPDX corpus closely enough to identify. Could be a heavily modified license, a custom license, or extraction picked up the wrong file.
unresolved
manual review
No license file could be located at all (no LICENSE_FILE set, and nothing matching LICENSE*/COPYING*/COPYRIGHT* found by searching the extracted source). Add LICENSE_FILE, or investigate why none exists.
extra license
manual review
The declared license's own text checks out, but the port's source also contains SPDX-License-Identifier tags for a different license nowhere reflected in LICENSE=. Check whether LICENSE= needs to become a multi-license declaration.
close
manual review
Same license family as declared, but the text doesn't verbatim-match the canonical SPDX wording (drifted, or has minor unauthorized changes). Compare against "Detected SPDX" and decide whether to fix the text or the tag.
retag
easy fix
License text is verbatim-correct, but LICENSE= still uses FreeBSD's old-style token instead of the SPDX identifier shown in "Declared SPDX". Just update the Makefile -- no text investigation needed.
verified
none
Manually attested as correct via lib/manual_exceptions.lua, overriding whatever the automated classifier concluded -- this is a human sign-off, not an independent tool verification. See the exceptions report page for the reason and who/when.
exact
none
Verbatim match against the SPDX canonical text, and LICENSE= already uses the correct SPDX spelling. Nothing to do.